Issues
How the Trump Administration Can Reform the Foreign Service
HUDSON INSTITUTE
03
December 2024
In the 100 years since the 1924 Rogers Act, many reforms have been proposed to make the Foreign Service more effective. Congress this year funded the bipartisan Congressional Commission on Reform and Modernization of the Department of State to “examine the changing nature of diplomacy and the ways in which the department can modernize to advance the interests of the United States.”
In recent years, prominent former foreign service officers have published studies on how to strengthen the Foreign Service and the State Department. But despite America’s massive deficit spending and declining US influence abroad, most proposals double down on the status quo: they recommend larger staffs and budgets, more emphasis on race and sex preferences in hiring, and greater control by career officials at the expense of elected leaders.
The incoming Trump administration has a rare opportunity to address these weaknesses and help the Foreign Service, and more broadly the State Department, advance the US national interest in the context of intensifying great power competition.
Join Senior Fellow Matt Boyse for a conversation with three former senior foreign service officers: Heritage Foundation Senior Research Fellow Simon Hankinson, Ambassador (ret.) Tibor Nagy, former assistant secretary of state for Africa, and University of Pittsburgh Adjunct Professor Drew Peterson. They will take stock of where the Foreign Service is today and highlight the opportunities for and challenges to reform during the second Trump administration.
Speakers:
Senior Research Fellow, Heritage Foundation
Fellow of the Ben Franklin Fellowship
Former Assistant Secretary of State for Africa
Professor Emeritus, Texas Tech University
Fellow of the Ben Franklin Fellowship
Adjunct Professor, University of Pittsburgh
Fellow of the Ben Franklin Fellowship
Moderator:
Senior Research Fellow, Heritage Foundation
Fellow of the Ben Franklin Fellowship
-
State Department Alums Take Aim at Foreign Service Reform
-
‘Resources are going to shrink.’ Expect State Dept cuts under Trump, formers say
Understanding the Federal Vacancies Reform Act:
The FVRA in a Nutshell
Temporary Appointments to Fill Presidential Appointment with Senate Confirmation (PAS) Vacancies:
I. Acting: (See the Federal Vacancies Reform Act (FVRA) of 1998 – 5 U.S.C. §§ 3345-3349d):
A.) Mechanisms: Under the FVRA, on Day 1 of a new administration, PAS vacancies can be filled on an interim basis in one of three different ways.
1.) The default is that whoever is the highest-ranking deputy to the PAS position now vacant will take over the duties on an interim basis.
2.) The President can appoint a PAS holdover from any federal agency to take over as the Acting official in any PAS position in the federal government.
3.) The President can appoint anyone meeting the following criteria to serve as the Acting official in any PAS position in the federal government (see 5 U.S.C. § 3345):
i. The individual appointed to serve as Acting must have served at that federal agency or department for at least 90 days out of the preceding 365 days; and
ii. The individual’s base pay must have been equivalent to that of the base pay of a GS-15, step 1, on the General Schedule (i.e., anyone who is at least a GS-14, step 7, or an FS-02, step 9, would meet this criterion).
B.) Legal Authority of the Position: The Acting official has full legal authority to perform all the duties of the position.
C.) Duration: Under the FVRA, an Acting official can serve for up to 210 days, but there are a number of caveats that can extend this time period.
1.) If a nomination to fill the position permanently is submitted to the Senate, the clock stops and the Acting official can serve during the entire nomination process.
2.) If the nomination is rejected or returned by the Senate or withdrawn by the President, the 210-day clock starts all over again and the Acting official can serve for an additional 210 days. If a second nomination is submitted to the Senate, the clock stops again until such time as the nomination is approved, rejected, returned, or withdrawn. If any of the latter three occur, the Acting official can serve for 210 more days (i.e., the clock restarts). (See 5 U.S.C. § 3346.)
3.) For all PAS vacancies that occur during the first 60 days of a new Administration, a vacancy is deemed not to occur until 90 days after the previous officeholder vacates the position. (See 5 U.S.C. § 3349a.) Thus, for the first 60 days of a new Administration, the 210-day clock is actually a 300-day clock.
See CRS Report from 2022 on the FVRA for more detailed information about how the FVRA works – particularly the section on the "Consequences of Violating the Vacancies Act" (starting on p. 15). BLUF: There is no penalty for staying longer than allowed unless some outside group sues and a court finds that the group was somehow harmed by the violation and thereby grants that group standing to sue (very difficult to establish standing in the area of foreign affairs, particularly as this is the area in which the President arguably has the greatest amount of power under the Constitution). Otherwise, there's almost nothing that can be done about a violation. The worst thing that happens is that a court can remove a person serving in violation of the law and any decisions made by that person while in violation of the law can be deemed illegitimate and annulled by the court.
Syrian National Charged with Diverting $9 Million in U.S.-funded Humanitarian Assistance to a Terrorist Organization Affiliated with Al-Qaida
It's Time to Fix the Foreign Service to Give Diplomacy a Chance
The U.S. Department of State as seen on Jan. 6, 2020 | MARK WILSON via Getty Images
Is Flying the Pride Flag at Embassies and Consulates Smart U.S. Diplomacy?
U.S. embassy in Moscow on June 30, 2022 | NATALIA KOLESNIKOVA/AFP via Getty Images
-
A U.S. Embassy Should Fly Only One Flag
-
Pride Flag Pause
By Phil Skotte
How the State Department’s Discriminatory DEI Programs Undermine U.S. Diplomacy and Betray American Values
KEY TAKEAWAYS
The United States needs a professional Foreign Service whose members are selected through objective, meritocratic criteria and are accountable to the President.
By de-emphasizing the Foreign Service Officer Test, the State Department has sidelined merit and equal opportunity in favor of “equity” based on race or sex.
In the name of “diversity, equity, and inclusion,” the State Department has instituted discriminatory criteria for recruitment, promotion, and job assignment.